Lamson Co. v. Central New York Regional Market Authority

258 A.D. 851, 15 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7228
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 851 (Lamson Co. v. Central New York Regional Market Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lamson Co. v. Central New York Regional Market Authority, 258 A.D. 851, 15 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The construction of the regional market was a public improvement. (Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. McMullen Co., 253 App. Div. 424; affd., 280 N. Y. 536.) The evidence shows that the Gray Steel Corporation entered into a contract with the general contractor for the construction of the regional market, in which the Gray Steel Corporation agreed to perform part of the contract of the general contractor. It also shows that the plaintiff entered into a contract with the Gray Steal Corporation for the performance of part of the latter’s contract. Therefore, the plaintiff became a subcontractor. fLien Law, § 2.) The contract referred to in the complaint and in the notice of hen was thereafter modified by oral agreement of the parties and the plaintiff performed work under such contract as modified and became entitled to a hen upon the moneys due for the construction of the regional market. The plaintiff has recovered in accordance with its complaint and its notice of hen. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the plaintiff on the undisputed evidence was a materialman and not a subcontractor. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s hen upon pubhc funds.) Present — Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowhng, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A & J Buyers, Inc. v. Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc.
250 N.E.2d 845 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Dorn v. Johnson
16 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Wynkoop v. People
1 A.D.2d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 A.D. 851, 15 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamson-co-v-central-new-york-regional-market-authority-nyappdiv-1939.