Lams v. Department of Justice
44 F. App'x 958
This text of 44 F. App'x 958 (Lams v. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lams v. Department of Justice, 44 F. App'x 958 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Rodolfo Lams having failed to pay the filing fee or file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The petition for review is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
We note that Lams petition for review is premature and must be dismissed on that ground also.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 F. App'x 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lams-v-department-of-justice-cafc-2002.