Lampson v. Estate of Hobart
27 Vt. 784
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lampson v. Estate of Hobart. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Vt. 697 →
Opinion
We think, in the state in which this case is presented, the plaintiff is entitled to open and close the argument. So far as the exceptions are concerned, the parties are equally entitled to the open and close. We must then fall back upon the general ground, that the plaintiff assumes the initiative in the proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lampson v. Estate of Hobart, 27 Vt. 784 (Vt. 1856).
27 Vt. 784 (Lampson v. Estate of Hobart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.