Lampman v. City of North Miami

209 So. 2d 273, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 1968·No. No. 67-557·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff below appeals an order granting summary final judgment in favor of the defendants. We find this case to be closely analogous to the case of Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601. It is the burden of a party moving for summary judgment to show conclusively that no material issues remain for trial. Plaintiff must, of course, prove the elements of her cause of action, but she need not do so until trial. To require her to prove her case in order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment imposes a burden upon plaintiff that is neither contemplated nor justified under the cases and rules of procedure. Therefore, the order appealed must be reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lampman v. City of North Miami, 209 So. 2d 273, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

209 So. 2d 273 (Lampman v. City of North Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Florida Realty & Management Co.
272 So. 2d 176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Byrd v. Leach
226 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
McClendon v. Key
209 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)