Lampman v. City of North Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lampman v. City of North Miami

209 So. 2d 273, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 23, 1968

DocketNo. 67-557

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 209 So. 2d 273 (Lampman v. City of North Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lampman v. City of North Miami, 209 So. 2d 273, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff below appeals an order granting summary final judgment in favor of the defendants. We find this case to be closely analogous to the case of Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601. It is the burden of a party moving for summary judgment to show conclusively that no material issues remain for trial. Plaintiff must, of course, prove the elements of her cause of action, but she need not do so until trial. To require her to prove her case in order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment imposes a burden upon plaintiff that is neither contemplated nor justified under the cases and rules of procedure. Therefore, the order appealed must be reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff below appeals an order granting summary final judgment in favor of the defendants. We find this case to be closely analogous to the case of Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601. It is the burden of a party moving for summary judgment to show conclusively that no material issues remain for trial. Plaintiff must, of course, prove the elements of her cause of action, but she need not do so until trial. To require her to prove her case in order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment imposes a burden upon plaintiff that is neither contemplated nor justified under the cases and rules of procedure. Therefore, the order appealed must be reversed.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 So. 2d 273, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampman-v-city-of-north-miami-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack