Lampley v. State

1946 OK CR 23, 166 P.2d 450, 82 Okla. Crim. 100, 1946 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lampley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 Okla. Crim. 95
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 20, 1946·No. No. A-10527.·Published

Opinion

BAREFOOT, J.

Defendant, L. E. Lampley, was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with the offense of requiring and permitting one Joan Ward, a female person, to work in his restaurant in the city of *101 Tulsa more tlian nine hours, to-wit: 12 hours, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., on the 13th day of August, 1943. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and has appealed.

This is a companion case of Lampley v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 95, 166 P. 2d 445. In that case this defendant was charged with requiring and permitting one Joan Ward, a female person, to work in a cafe managed and operated by the defendant more than 54 hours in one week, to wit: from and inclusive of August 1, 1943 to and inclusive of August 7, 1943, from 7 o’clock a.m. until 7 o’clock p.m., on each date.

The evidence and questions of law are identical in both cases, and the same statute, 4Ó O. S. 1941 § 81, covers both charges. One brief has been filed by defendant in support of his contentions.

For the reasons stated in the case of Lampley v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 95, 166 P. 2d 445, the judgment and sentence of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lampley v. State, 1946 OK CR 23, 166 P.2d 450, 82 Okla. Crim. 100, 1946 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 174 (Okla. Ct. App. 1946).

1946 OK CR 23 (Lampley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lampley v. State
1946 OK CR 20 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1946)