Lampley v. State
506 So. 2d 12, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388
Opinion
This is an appeal from a sentence which was excessive because of an improper departure from the guidelines. See Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986). Although the appellant has served the in-carcerative portion of his split sentence, the issue is still viable because of the length of the probationary period. Cf Crews v. State, 502 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected sentence in conformity with the guidelines.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lampley v. State, 506 So. 2d 12, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 12 (Lampley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crews v. State
502 So. 2d 1360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Whitehead v. State
498 So. 2d 863 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)