Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lampley v. State

Lampley v. State

506 So. 2d 12, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 26, 1987
DocketNo. 85-1902
StatusPublished

This text of 506 So. 2d 12 (Lampley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lampley v. State, 506 So. 2d 12, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence which was excessive because of an improper departure from the guidelines. See Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986). Although the appellant has served the in-carcerative portion of his split sentence, the issue is still viable because of the length of the probationary period. Cf Crews v. State, 502 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected sentence in conformity with the guidelines.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crews v. State
502 So. 2d 1360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Whitehead v. State
498 So. 2d 863 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 So. 2d 12, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampley-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.