Lampkin v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Lampkin v. Thomas

80 So. 398, 202 Ala. 316, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 402

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 28, 1918·No. 8 Div. 111.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

Eliminating the question of the credibility of the witnesses, we are of the opinion that the evidence in this case did not justify the allowance of the item of $3 for oats and $2.50 for corn, as part of the account against defendant.

Let the judgment be corrected by deducting these items, and, as corrected, affirmed at the cost of appellee.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SOMERVILLE, J.

Eliminating the question of the credibility of the witnesses, we are of the opinion that the evidence in this case did not justify the allowance of the item of $3 for oats and $2.50 for corn, as part of the account against defendant.

Let the judgment be corrected by deducting these items, and, as corrected, affirmed at the cost of appellee.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Lampkin v. Thomas, 80 So. 398, 202 Ala. 316, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 402 (Ala. 1918).

Pincite

80 So. 398 (Lampkin v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related