Lampkin v. Thomas

80 So. 398, 202 Ala. 316, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 402
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 28, 1918
Docket8 Div. 111.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 So. 398 (Lampkin v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lampkin v. Thomas, 80 So. 398, 202 Ala. 316, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 402 (Ala. 1918).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

Eliminating the question of the credibility of the witnesses, we are of the opinion that the evidence in this case did not justify the allowance of the item of $3 for oats and $2.50 for corn, as part of the account against defendant.

Let the judgment be corrected by deducting these items, and, as corrected, affirmed at the cost of appellee.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashurst v. Rosser
153 So. 2d 240 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 So. 398, 202 Ala. 316, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampkin-v-thomas-ala-1918.