Lampkin, Esaw

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 9, 2015
DocketPD-1333-15
StatusPublished

This text of Lampkin, Esaw (Lampkin, Esaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lampkin, Esaw, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PD-1333-15

CASUE NO. ____________

IN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

PETITIONER

October 9, 2015 VS.

ESAW LAMPKIN,

RESPONDENT

Petition in Cause No. 42.897-B From the 124th Judicial District Court of Gregg County, Texas and

The Court of Appeals for the Sixth District of Texas, Cause No. 06-14-00024-CR

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Comes now THE STATE OF TEXAS, Movant and Petitioner, and files this, its

Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Discretionary Review in accordance

with TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b) and 68.2(c). In support thereof, Movant respectfully shows

this Honorable Court the following: 1. The deadline for filing the item in question (a Petition for Discretionary review)

was: 9/24/2015.

a. Appellant/Respondent’s Petition for Rehearing was denied on 8/25/2015.

b. This motion is due on or before 10/9/2015. TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(c).

2. Length of extension sought: 15 days to and including 10/9/2015, or such date as

permits the filing of the (attached) Petition for Discretionary Review.

3. The facts relief on to reasonably explain the need for an extension:

The undersigned is a Special Prosecutor for the Gregg County District Attorney’s

Office for purposes of this case only, a solo practitioner, and is not otherwise

affiliated with the office of the District Attorney. The undersigned had several

filing deadlines, including this one, on September 24, 2015, and suffered an

intranet/router (server) failure in his office on that day that could not be fixed in

time to permit timely filing. The undersigned had no way to predict that these

problems would occur and no way to access his files pending repairs to the

equipment.

4. The number of previous extensions granted regarding the item in question:

none.

Additionally, a copy of Petition for Discretionary Review is attached hereto as Exhibit.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant respectfully requests that

the Court grant its Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Discretionary

Review, permit Movant to file the attached Petition for Discretionary Review, and for

-2- any other and further relief, whether at law or in equity, to which Movant has shown

itself justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ L. Charles van Cleef

_______________________________ L. Charles van Cleef State Bar No. 00786305

P.O. Box 2432 Longview, Texas 75606-2432 (903) 248-8244 Telephone (903) 248-8249 Facsimile

COUNSEL FOR MOVANT and PETITIONER

-3- I. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been

forwarded by email/e-filing to:

Hough-Lewis “Lew” Dunn Attorney at Law 201 E. Methvin, Suite 102 P.O. Box 2226 Longview, TX 75606 dunn@texramp.net

Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney of Texas P.O. Box 13046 Austin, TX 78711-3046 information@spa.texas.gov and by Fax: 512-463-5724

on this Friday, October 9, 2015. /s/ L. Charles van Cleef

_________________________________ L. Charles van Cleef

-4-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lampkin, Esaw, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampkin-esaw-texapp-2015.