Lampert v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lampert v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n

922 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2006 WL 617957

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-4077

StatusPublished

This text of 922 So. 2d 1064 (Lampert v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lampert v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n, 922 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2006 WL 617957 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to this Court’s order of December 8, 2005, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Canfield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (reaffirming the traditional test for finality requiring that “no further action by the court will be necessary”); Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (holding order that contains contingency allowing proceedings to continue is not a final or[1065]*1065der). The administrative order on appeal is not a final order. Specifically, this order reserves jurisdiction to address the specific accommodation or equipment needed by the appellants. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellants’ right to appeal once a final order disposing of the remaining issue has been entered.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to this Court’s order of December 8, 2005, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Canfield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (reaffirming the traditional test for finality requiring that “no further action by the court will be necessary”); Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (holding order that contains contingency allowing proceedings to continue is not a final or[1065]*1065der). The administrative order on appeal is not a final order. Specifically, this order reserves jurisdiction to address the specific accommodation or equipment needed by the appellants. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellants’ right to appeal once a final order disposing of the remaining issue has been entered.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2006 WL 617957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampert-v-florida-birth-related-neurological-injury-compensation-assn-fladistctapp-2006.