Lampert-Sacher v. Sacher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lampert-Sacher v. Sacher

109 So. 3d 862, 2013 WL 950710, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3924

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 2013

DocketNo. 1D12-5609

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 3d 862 (Lampert-Sacher v. Sacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lampert-Sacher v. Sacher, 109 So. 3d 862, 2013 WL 950710, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3924 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Former wife appeals two orders of the circuit court dated October 17, 2012. The first establishes a temporary timesharing schedule for the parties regarding the parties’ minor children. The second order found former wife in contempt, imposed sanctions, and awarded attorney’s fees to former husband. Former wife argues on appeal that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to allow her sufficient time to present her case. She also argues that the order of contempt is erroneous as a matter of law on its face. Former husband confesses error. We find such confession to be proper in the circumstances and accordingly reverse the orders on appeal and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED.

BENTON, C.J., WOLF and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Former wife appeals two orders of the circuit court dated October 17, 2012. The first establishes a temporary timesharing schedule for the parties regarding the parties’ minor children. The second order found former wife in contempt, imposed sanctions, and awarded attorney’s fees to former husband. Former wife argues on appeal that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to allow her sufficient time to present her case. She also argues that the order of contempt is erroneous as a matter of law on its face. Former husband confesses error. We find such confession to be proper in the circumstances and accordingly reverse the orders on appeal and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED.

BENTON, C.J., WOLF and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 3d 862, 2013 WL 950710, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampert-sacher-v-sacher-fladistctapp-2013.