Lampert Capital Markets, Inc. v. ICMC Holdings LLC

2017 NY Slip Op 1469, 147 A.D.3d 660, 46 N.Y.S.3d 884
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 2017·No. 3205 152235/13·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.), entered on or about January 13, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff and third-party defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Lampert Advisors LLC’s counterclaim for specific performance of a term sheet and dismissing defendant/third-party plaintiff’s third counterclaim/third-party claim for unjust enrichment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence does not establish as a matter of law that the parties intended the term sheet to be an enforceable agreement, rather than an agreement to agree (see Offit v Herman, 132 AD3d 409 [1st Dept 2015]).

In view of the foregoing, the unjust enrichment claim was correctly sustained.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lampert Capital Markets, Inc. v. ICMC Holdings LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 1469, 147 A.D.3d 660, 46 N.Y.S.3d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 1469 (Lampert Capital Markets, Inc. v. ICMC Holdings LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Offit v. Herman
132 A.D.3d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)