Lampariello v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital
This text of 115 A.D.2d 964 (Lampariello v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated by Justice Lynch at Special Term. We add only that the second cause of action alleges lack of informed consent in connection with the delivery of the infant and with the administration of oxygen to the fetus, procedures in which defendant was not involved. The third and fourth causes of action, in favor of the infant’s father, are time [965]*965barred. (Appeal from judgment and order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Lynch, J.—summary judgment.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 964, 497 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampariello-v-crouse-irving-memorial-hospital-nyappdiv-1985.