Lamp v. Virginia Parole Board
Opinion
Bernard Gregory Lamp seeks to appeal the order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [279] (2000) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the district court dismissed fewer than all claims of all parties in the order Lamp seeks to appeal, the order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
78 F. App'x 278 (Lamp v. Virginia Parole Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.