Lamp v. County of Cortland

New York Court of Appeals

Lamp v. County of Cortland

781 N.E.2d 905, 98 N.Y.2d 748, 751 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3142

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 17, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 781 N.E.2d 905 (Lamp v. County of Cortland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamp v. County of Cortland, 781 N.E.2d 905, 98 N.Y.2d 748, 751 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3142 (N.Y. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, arid defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. Under the circumstances of this case, plaintiff raised triable issues of fact on the common-law negligence cause of action as to whether defendants owed a duty of care and whether defendants breached that duty.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI