Lamott v. M'Laughlin
3 Md. 324
This text of 3 Md. 324 (Lamott v. M'Laughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lamott v. M'Laughlin, 3 Md. 324 (Va. Super. Ct. 1793).
Opinion
on full deliberation and examination of the authorities, determined that as the plea of limitations was not a plea to the merits, it should not be received after the rule day, nor amended if pleaded defectively.
The Chief Justice said that 1 Bl. Rep. and Barnes’s Notes, made the true distinction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Md. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamott-v-mlaughlin-vagensess-1793.