LaMonte v. Mott

116 A. 269, 93 N.J. Eq. 229, 8 Stock. 229, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 288
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 18, 1921·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tlie decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Kalisoii, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Williams — 8. For reversal — Parker, Minturn, Heppenheimer, Gardner — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaMonte v. Mott, 116 A. 269, 93 N.J. Eq. 229, 8 Stock. 229, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 288 (N.J. 1921).

116 A. 269 (LaMonte v. Mott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutton v. Reagan & Gee
405 S.W.2d 828 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Bank of Washington
120 S.E.2d 830 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Breen v. Peck
146 A.2d 665 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield
110 A.2d 24 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
Diedrick v. Helm
14 N.W.2d 913 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1944)
Baird v. Frankline
141 F.2d 238 (Second Circuit, 1944)
Green v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank
100 S.W.2d 132 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)