Lamoille County Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Buck

69 Vt. 369
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Tart, J.

It appears from the record in this cause that no appeal was taken from the final decree. It is only from such a decree that one can be had. V. S. 981; Nelson v. Brown, 59 Vt. 600. The cause, therefore, is not properly in this court and should be remanded to the court of chancery. The appeal was taken from the taxation of costs only, and will not lie. Mott v. Harrington, 15 Vt. 185. The court rarely if ever reverses a decree on the question of costs alone. Hastings v. Perry, 20 Vt. 272; Sanborn v. Kittredge, ibid 632; Sanders v. Wilson, 34 Vt. 318; Lamoille Valley R. Co. v. Bixby, 57 Vt. 548; Flannery v. Flannery, 58 Vt. 576.

Appeal dismissed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamoille County Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Buck, 69 Vt. 369 (Vt. 1897).

69 Vt. 369 (Lamoille County Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Buck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Page's Administrator
99 A. 780 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1917)