Lammertz v. Lammertz
45 A. 271, 59 N.J. Eq. 649, 14 Dickinson 649, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 171
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon —8.
For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Collins, Lippincott, Adams, V REDENBURGH — 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lammertz v. Lammertz, 45 A. 271, 59 N.J. Eq. 649, 14 Dickinson 649, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 171 (N.J. 1899).
45 A. 271 (Lammertz v. Lammertz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacobs v. Jacobs
263 A.2d 155 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Henderson v. Henderson
35 A.2d 686 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
O'Brien v. O'Brien
142 A. 898 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Hudson v. Hudson
59 Fla. 529 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Hall v. Hall
46 A. 866 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1900)