Lammertz v. Lammertz

45 A. 271, 59 N.J. Eq. 649, 14 Dickinson 649, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 171
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 20, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 45 A. 271 (Lammertz v. Lammertz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lammertz v. Lammertz, 45 A. 271, 59 N.J. Eq. 649, 14 Dickinson 649, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 171 (N.J. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon —8.

For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Collins, Lippincott, Adams, V REDENBURGH — 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacobs v. Jacobs
263 A.2d 155 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Henderson v. Henderson
35 A.2d 686 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
O'Brien v. O'Brien
142 A. 898 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Hudson v. Hudson
59 Fla. 529 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Hall v. Hall
46 A. 866 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A. 271, 59 N.J. Eq. 649, 14 Dickinson 649, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lammertz-v-lammertz-nj-1899.