Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.
282 U.S. 812, 51 S. Ct. 214
This text of 282 U.S. 812 (Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co., 282 U.S. 812, 51 S. Ct. 214 (1931).
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question, Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wabash Railroad v. Flannigan
192 U.S. 29 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Erie Railroad v. Solomon
237 U.S. 427 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Zucht v. King
260 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. Smith
278 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
282 U.S. 812, 51 S. Ct. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamm-v-silver-falls-timber-co-scotus-1931.