Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.
282 U.S. 812, 51 S. Ct. 214
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question, Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co., 282 U.S. 812, 51 S. Ct. 214 (1931).
282 U.S. 812 (Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wabash Railroad v. Flannigan
192 U.S. 29 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Erie Railroad v. Solomon
237 U.S. 427 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Zucht v. King
260 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. Smith
278 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court, 1929)