Lamkin v. Maxwell
This text of 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 322 (Lamkin v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs were absentees and it was decided in Allain v. Millandon, 2 La. 552, and in Hill v. Barton, 6 Rob. 150, that a mortgage, executed and recorded by the mortgagor in favor of an absentee, and not accepted by him, takes rank over a subsequent mortgage. Inquiry into the rank of these mortgages is useless The title never for a moment vested in Morrison, and the mortgages [323]*323were without effect. The plaintiffs bought the house of him and thereby acquired any right he had to it, and they acquired the lot from its owners, together with any rights they may have had to the house.
Judgment reversed and injunction perpetuated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamkin-v-maxwell-la-1880.