Lamkin v. Johnson
This text of 56 A. 750 (Lamkin v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“A motion for a nonsuit will not be granted where there is any evidence upon which a jury can properly find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed.” Hovey v. Brown, 59 N. H. 114, 116; Paine v. Railway, 58 N H. 611.
In this case there was evidence from which it could be found that prior to September 4, 1901, the sale of the goods to La'ducer had been rescinded by mutual consent; that the title to the goods never vested in Mineau; that on September 4, 1901, when the *346 defendant converted them to his own use, the title and right of possession was in the plaintiffs; that the lien created by the defendant’s attachment, if valid, was abandoned; and that there was no sale of the goods by Laducer to the defendant.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A. 750, 72 N.H. 344, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamkin-v-johnson-nh-1903.