Lamire v. Industrial Commission

212 N.W. 415, 170 Minn. 300, 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1420
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 18, 1927
DocketNo. 26,043.
StatusPublished

This text of 212 N.W. 415 (Lamire v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lamire v. Industrial Commission, 212 N.W. 415, 170 Minn. 300, 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1420 (Mich. 1927).

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

This motion to quash a writ of certiorari to the industrial commission must be and is granted.

The order sought to be reviewed provides for a change of physicians and hospitalization and is made pursuant to Gr. S. 1923, § 4279. Thereby the industrial commission is empowered, upon the request of either employe or employer, to “order a change of physicians and designate a physician suggested by the injured employe or by the Commission itself.”

*301 It is thus apparent that the order is wholly of an administrative nature. It is not an award or disallowance of compensation and does not involve “the merits of the case or any part thereof” within the meaning of G. S. 1923, § 4320, concerning the review of orders of the industrial commission by certiorari.

Writ of certiorari discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 N.W. 415, 170 Minn. 300, 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamire-v-industrial-commission-minn-1927.