Lamerdin v. Pitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lamerdin v. Pitz

235 A.D. 850

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 850 (Lamerdin v. Pitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamerdin v. Pitz, 235 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, [851]*851with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to permit discovery and inspection of the minute book showing the meeting of the board of directors on August 29, 1931, and the book or records containing a statement of the loan or loans of said bank, and the notes received therefor, for a period of one year prior to August 29, 1931; with leave to apply at Special Term after such discovery and inspection as is here granted if so advised, for a further order, either with or without examination of one or more of the defendants, with a referee to direct and superintend such discovery or inspection; the time and place of examination to be determined upon application to Special Term, to which the matter is remitted. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, [851]*851with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to permit discovery and inspection of the minute book showing the meeting of the board of directors on August 29, 1931, and the book or records containing a statement of the loan or loans of said bank, and the notes received therefor, for a period of one year prior to August 29, 1931; with leave to apply at Special Term after such discovery and inspection as is here granted if so advised, for a further order, either with or without examination of one or more of the defendants, with a referee to direct and superintend such discovery or inspection; the time and place of examination to be determined upon application to Special Term, to which the matter is remitted. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamerdin-v-pitz-nyappdiv-1932.