Lambros v. Andreaci
This text of 52 F.3d 330 (Lambros v. Andreaci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 330
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
John Gregory LAMBROS, Appellant,
v.
Luis Carlos ANDREACI, Federal Bureau of Prisons # 09693-004,
Riverside Halfway House, Miami, Florida, in his
individual and official capacity; John
Doe, Appellees.
No. 94-2839
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Apr. 7, 1995
Filed: Apr. 12, 1995
Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
John Gregory Lambros appeals from the district court's1 dismissal of his complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court committed no error of law in dismissing Lambros's complaint, in refusing to appoint him counsel, or in denying his discovery motion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 330, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21080, 1995 WL 215503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambros-v-andreaci-ca8-1995.