Lambright v. Stewart
177 F.3d 901
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 25, 1999·No. Nos. 96-99020, 96-99025 and 96-99026·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lam-bright v. Stewart, 167 F.3d 477 (9th Cir.1999), is withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambright v. Stewart, 177 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 1999).
177 F.3d 901 (Lambright v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joe Leonard Lambright v. Dora B. Schriro, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections
490 F.3d 1103 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Lambright v. Schriro
485 F.3d 512 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Joe Leonard Lambright v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Robert Douglas Smith v. Terry Stewart, Robert Douglas Smith v. Terry Stewart
191 F.3d 1181 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Lambright v. Stewart
191 F.3d 1181 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)