Lambeth v. State

675 So. 2d 1361, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 272, 1995 WL 444592
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 28, 1995·No. CR-94-0701·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

Randall Lambeth appeals the revocation of his probation. The State in its brief notes that the trial court failed to make written findings as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking Lambeth’s probation as required by Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975), and by Rule 27.6(f), Ala.R.Crim.P., and requests that this court remand this cause to the trial court.

Therefore, this cause is remanded with directions that the trial court enter a written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for revoking Lambeth’s probation. Wilson v. State, 659 So.2d 970 (Ala.Crim.App.1994). The trial court shall take the necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the [1362]*1362earliest possible time and within 70 days of the release of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambeth v. State, 675 So. 2d 1361, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 272, 1995 WL 444592 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).

675 So. 2d 1361 (Lambeth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armstrong v. State
312 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Wilson v. State
659 So. 2d 970 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)