Lamberton v. Delaware & Hudson Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lamberton v. Delaware & Hudson Co.

230 A.D. 749

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 749 (Lamberton v. Delaware & Hudson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamberton v. Delaware & Hudson Co., 230 A.D. 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the charge of the trial court as to warning signals by whistle and bell did not contain reversible error under the pleadings, proofs and circumstances of this case, and on the authority of Smith v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (77 App. Div. 43) and Cepenobwiz v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co. (147 id. 188, 193). Present — Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the charge of the trial court as to warning signals by whistle and bell did not contain reversible error under the pleadings, proofs and circumstances of this case, and on the authority of Smith v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (77 App. Div. 43) and Cepenobwiz v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co. (147 id. 188, 193). Present — Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamberton-v-delaware-hudson-co-nyappdiv-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack