Lambert v. Webb

Fourth Circuit

Lambert v. Webb

34 F. App'x 923

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2002·No. No. 01-2358·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to remand the action to state court and dismissing the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b), 41(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lambert v. Webb, No. CA-00-60-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2001; Sept. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to remand the action to state court and dismissing the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b), 41(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lambert v. Webb, No. CA-00-60-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2001; Sept. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lambert v. Webb, 34 F. App'x 923 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

34 F. App'x 923 (Lambert v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.