Lambert v. Vare
103 A. 1053, 89 N.J. Eq. 211, 4 Stock. 211, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 327
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner— 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambert v. Vare, 103 A. 1053, 89 N.J. Eq. 211, 4 Stock. 211, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 327 (N.J. 1918).
103 A. 1053 (Lambert v. Vare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.