Lambert v. Teisina
This text of Lambert v. Teisina (Lambert v. Teisina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001024 15-JUL-2013 09:31 AM
SCWC-12-0001024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
HOVEY B. LAMBERT, Trustee under the Hovey B. Lambert Trust, an Unrecorded Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated April 5, 2002, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
LESIELI TEISINA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
and
PENISIMANI TEISINA, Petitioner/Intervenor-Appellant,
WAHA (K), et al., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0001024; CIV. NO. 09-1-2529-10)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, McKenna and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Lee, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)
The application for a writ of certiorari, filed on June
12, 2013, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall file a
supplemental brief addressing the exception to the final judgment
requirement announced in Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848) in relation to an order confirming a partition sale. Each party’s
supplemental brief shall not exceed 10 pages in length and shall
be filed within 14 days after the filing of this order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 15, 2013.
R. Steven Geshell for /s/ Paula A. Nakayama petitioners /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Philip J. Leas, W. Keoni Shultz and Lori K. Amano /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Randal K. Lee
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lambert v. Teisina, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-teisina-haw-2013.