Lambert v. Teisina

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lambert v. Teisina. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 457
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0001024·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0001024

15-JUL-2013

09:31 AM

SCWC-12-0001024

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

HOVEY B. LAMBERT, Trustee under the Hovey B. Lambert Trust, an Unrecorded Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated April 5, 2002, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LESIELI TEISINA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, and

PENISIMANI TEISINA, Petitioner/Intervenor-Appellant, and

WAHA (K), et al., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0001024; CIV. NO. 09-1-2529-10)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, McKenna and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Lee, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)

The application for a writ of certiorari, filed on June 12, 2013, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall file a supplemental brief addressing the exception to the final judgment requirement announced in Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848) in

relation to an order confirming a partition sale. Each party’s supplemental brief shall not exceed 10 pages in length and shall be filed within 14 days after the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 15, 2013.

R. Steven Geshell for /s/ Paula A. Nakayama petitioners /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Philip J. Leas, W. Keoni Shultz and Lori K. Amano /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Randal K. Lee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambert v. Teisina, (haw 2013).

Lambert v. Teisina (Lambert v. Teisina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forgay v. Conrad
47 U.S. 201 (Supreme Court, 1848)