Lambert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lambert v. State

1927 OK CR 266, 258 P. 1118, 38 Okla. Crim. 101, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 252

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 9, 1927

DocketNo. A-6086.

StatusPublished

This text of 1927 OK CR 266 (Lambert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lambert v. State, 1927 OK CR 266, 258 P. 1118, 38 Okla. Crim. 101, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 252 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to a term of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50. Judgment was rendered on November 2, 1925, and the appeal was filed in this court on November 24, 1926. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted. We have examined the record, and find that the information correctly charges the offense, the evidence sustains the verdict, and no prejudicial error is apparent. The case is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs. DAVENPORT, J., absent, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to a term of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50. Judgment was rendered on November 2, 1925, and the appeal was filed in this court on November 24, 1926. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted. We have examined the record, and find that the information correctly charges the offense, the evidence sustains the verdict, and no prejudicial error is apparent. The case is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs. DAVENPORT, J., absent, not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK CR 266, 258 P. 1118, 38 Okla. Crim. 101, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-state-oklacrimapp-1927.