Lambert v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lambert v. State

113 S.E. 33, 28 Ga. App. 757, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 838

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1922

Docket13642

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 33 (Lambert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lambert v. State, 113 S.E. 33, 28 Ga. App. 757, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 838 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction. The special

ground of the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence falls within the rule that it is impeaching and cumulative and would not likely produce a different result upon another trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction. The special

ground of the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence falls within the rule that it is impeaching and cumulative and would not likely produce a different result upon another trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 S.E. 33, 28 Ga. App. 757, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-state-gactapp-1922.