Lambert v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lambert v. State

76 S.E. 73, 11 Ga. App. 764, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 164

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 22, 1912

Docket4372

StatusPublished

This text of 76 S.E. 73 (Lambert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lambert v. State, 76 S.E. 73, 11 Ga. App. 764, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 164 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The offense of selling intoxicating liquor is sufficiently shown by proof of one sale.

2. The jury are fully authorized to believe one witness, who testifies positively to the fact of one sale, though his evidence as to that fact be directly contradicted by the evidence of many witnesses.

3. No error of law is complained of, the evidence supports the verdict, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. The offense of selling intoxicating liquor is sufficiently shown by proof of one sale.

2. The jury are fully authorized to believe one witness, who testifies positively to the fact of one sale, though his evidence as to that fact be directly contradicted by the evidence of many witnesses.

3. No error of law is complained of, the evidence supports the verdict, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 S.E. 73, 11 Ga. App. 764, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-state-gactapp-1912.