Lambert v. State

884 S.W.2d 626, 318 Ark. 327, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 562
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 17, 1994·No. CR 94-1037·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert P. Remet, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambert v. State, 884 S.W.2d 626, 318 Ark. 327, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 562 (Ark. 1994).

884 S.W.2d 626 (Lambert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarry v. State
702 S.W.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
State v. Neverls
702 S.W.2d 901 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1985)