Lambert v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lambert v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins.

90 N.Y.S. 1103

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 10, 1904·Published

Opinion

FREEDMAN, P. J.

The facts essential to support the jurisdiction of the court of North Carolina, by virtue of service upon the insurance commissioner, are recited in the records of these cases with greater particularity than in the action of Johnston v. This Defendant (opinion filed herewith) 90 N. Y. Supp. 539, and the records are complete, without report to extraneous proof. Judgments affirmed, with costs.

BISCHOFF, J., takes no part. FITZGERALD, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FREEDMAN, P. J.

The facts essential to support the jurisdiction of the court of North Carolina, by virtue of service upon the insurance commissioner, are recited in the records of these cases with greater particularity than in the action of Johnston v. This Defendant (opinion filed herewith) 90 N. Y. Supp. 539, and the records are complete, without report to extraneous proof. Judgments affirmed, with costs.

BISCHOFF, J., takes no part. FITZGERALD, J., concurs.

Lambert v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins., 90 N.Y.S. 1103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

90 N.Y.S. 1103 (Lambert v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related