Lambert v. Mecklenburg County
This text of 670 F. App'x 780 (Lambert v. Mecklenburg County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Joseph B. Lambert appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Lambert’s motion to amend his complaint as futile. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lambert v. Mecklenburg Cty., No. 3:15—cv-00577-GCM, 2016 WL 3176593 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
■ AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-mecklenburg-county-ca4-2016.