Lambert v. Mecklenburg County

670 F. App'x 780
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 16-1755·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph B. Lambert appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Lambert’s motion to amend his complaint as futile. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lambert v. Mecklenburg Cty., No. 3:15—cv-00577-GCM, 2016 WL 3176593 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

■ AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambert v. Mecklenburg County, 670 F. App'x 780 (4th Cir. 2016).

670 F. App'x 780 (Lambert v. Mecklenburg County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russe v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2021