Lambert v. Johnson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lambert v. Johnson

109 So. 2d 187

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 1959·No. No. A-354·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the title to the subject automobile was vested in the purchaser, James Gaston Goynes, whose automobile bore a license tag issued to the seller ap-pellee d/b/a Johnson’s -Used Cars and that such does not render the licensee liable in tort, the summary judgment was properly entered.

Affirmed on the authority of McAfee v. Killingsworth, Fla., 98 So.2d 738; Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., Fla., 81 So.2d 635; Platt v. Dreka, Fla., 79 So.2d 670.

STURGIS, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the title to the subject automobile was vested in the purchaser, James Gaston Goynes, whose automobile bore a license tag issued to the seller ap-pellee d/b/a Johnson’s -Used Cars and that such does not render the licensee liable in tort, the summary judgment was properly entered.

Affirmed on the authority of McAfee v. Killingsworth, Fla., 98 So.2d 738; Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., Fla., 81 So.2d 635; Platt v. Dreka, Fla., 79 So.2d 670.

STURGIS, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Lambert v. Johnson, 109 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

109 So. 2d 187 (Lambert v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related