Lambert v. Johnson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lambert v. Johnson

109 So. 2d 187

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 24, 1959

DocketNo. A-354

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 109 So. 2d 187 (Lambert v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lambert v. Johnson, 109 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the title to the subject automobile was vested in the purchaser, James Gaston Goynes, whose automobile bore a license tag issued to the seller ap-pellee d/b/a Johnson’s -Used Cars and that such does not render the licensee liable in tort, the summary judgment was properly entered.

Affirmed on the authority of McAfee v. Killingsworth, Fla., 98 So.2d 738; Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., Fla., 81 So.2d 635; Platt v. Dreka, Fla., 79 So.2d 670.

STURGIS, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the title to the subject automobile was vested in the purchaser, James Gaston Goynes, whose automobile bore a license tag issued to the seller ap-pellee d/b/a Johnson’s -Used Cars and that such does not render the licensee liable in tort, the summary judgment was properly entered.

Affirmed on the authority of McAfee v. Killingsworth, Fla., 98 So.2d 738; Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., Fla., 81 So.2d 635; Platt v. Dreka, Fla., 79 So.2d 670.

STURGIS, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD, J., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 2d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-johnson-fladistctapp-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack