Lambert v. Heurtas

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided April 22, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-05980·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 JOSHUA D. LAMBERT, CASE NO. 3:19-cv-05980-RJB-JRC 11 Plaintiff, AMENDED PRETRIAL 12 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 13 XLOMARA HUERTAS et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court previously 17 entered a Pretrial Scheduling Order setting a discovery deadline of July 1, 2020 and a dispositive 18 motion deadline of August 3, 2020. See Dkt. 27. The Court extended the deadlines to October 19 16, 2020 and October 30, 2020, respectively. Dkt. 98. Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint 20 on March 19, 2021. Dkt. 128. Defendants have now filed an answer to plaintiff’s second 21 amended complaint. Dkt. 130, 131. Accordingly, the Court hereby establishes the following 22 amended pretrial schedule: 23 24 1 (1) Discovery 2 All discovery shall be completed by June 25, 2021. Service of responses to 3 interrogatories and to requests to produce, and the taking of depositions, shall be completed by 4 this date. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a) requires answers or objections to be served

5 within thirty (30) days after service of the interrogatories. The serving party, therefore, must 6 serve his/her interrogatories at least thirty (30) days before the deadline in order to allow the 7 other party time to answer. 8 (2) Motion to Compel to Discovery 9 Any motion to compel discovery shall be filed not later than July 9, 2021. Before filing a 10 discovery motion, the parties must confer and attempt to resolve their differences. A good faith 11 effort to confer with a party or person not making a disclosure or discovery requires a face-to-face 12 meeting or a telephone conference. If unable to resolve their differences, the party filing the 13 discovery motion must, either within the motion to compel or in a separate affidavit attached to the 14 motion to compel, list the date, manner, and participants to the conference. If the moving party

15 fails to include such a certification, the court may deny the motion without addressing the merits of 16 the dispute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and LCR 37(a)(1). 17 The motion to compel must: (1) list the matters on which the parties were unable to agree; 18 (2) identify the nature and relevance of the documents and materials sought; (3) list the reason(s) 19 why the mandatory initial disclosures were inadequate; and, (4) explain why the discovery sought 20 is proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the 21 action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ 22 resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or 23 expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit.

24 1 (3) Dispositive Motions 2 Any dispositive motion shall be filed and served on or before July 23, 2021. Pursuant to 3 LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a part of the 4 motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption

5 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for 6 consideration upon the Court’s motion calendar. Dispositive motions shall be noted for 7 consideration on a date no earlier than the fourth Friday following filing and service of the 8 motion. LCR 7(d)(3). 9 All briefs and affidavits in opposition to any motion shall be filed and served pursuant to 10 the requirements of Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LCR 7. The party 11 making a motion may file and serve a reply to the opposing party’s briefs and affidavits. Any 12 reply brief shall also be filed and served pursuant to the requirements of Rule 7 of the Federal 13 Rules of Civil Procedure and LCR 7. 14 Defendants are reminded that they MUST serve Rand and Wyatt notices, in a separate

15 document, concurrently with motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment so that pro 16 se prisoner plaintiffs will have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required of them in 17 order to oppose those motions. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 941 (9th Cir. 2012). The Ninth 18 Circuit has set forth model language for such notices: 19 A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. 20 Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary 21 judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about any 22 fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will 23 end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn 24 1 testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to 2 interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s declarations and 3 documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary 4 judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no 5 trial.

6 Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 963 (9th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added); see Wyatt v. Terhune, 7 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003) (extending the fair notice requirement to motions to 8 dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies). Defendants who fail to file and serve the 9 required Rand and Wyatt notices on the plaintiff may have their motion stricken from the Court’s 10 calendar with leave to re-file. 11 (4) Joint Pretrial Statement 12 The parties are advised that a due date for filing a Joint Pretrial Statement may be 13 established at a later date pending the outcome of any dispositive motions. 14 (5) Proof of Service and Sanctions 15 All motions, pretrial statements and other filings shall be accompanied by proof that such 16 documents have been served upon counsel for the opposing party or upon any party acting pro 17 se. The proof of service shall show the day and manner of service and may be by written 18 acknowledgment of service, by certificate of a member of the bar of this Court, by affidavit of 19 the person who served the papers, or by any other proof satisfactory to the Court. Failure to 20 comply with the provisions of the Order can result in dismissal/default judgment or other 21 appropriate sanctions. 22 23 24 1 (6) The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to 2 counsel for defendants. 3 4 Dated this 22nd day of April, 2021.

6 A 7 J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambert v. Heurtas, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Lambert v. Heurtas (Lambert v. Heurtas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earnest Woods, II v. Tom Carey
684 F.3d 934 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Wyatt v. Terhune
315 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)