Lambert v. Ernst

268 A.D. 771, 49 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3394
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent-appellant concedes that petitioner-appellant is entitled to" an order granting substitution of attorneys in pending cases. The question as to the right of respondent-appellant to a retaining lien, in the present state of the record, was properly determined.

The order should, accordingly, be modified to the extent of granting substitution and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously modified to the extent of granting substitution of attorneys, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambert v. Ernst, 268 A.D. 771, 49 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 771 (Lambert v. Ernst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D'Amico v. Nuzzo
138 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)