Lambert v. Cook

104 S.E. 509, 25 Ga. App. 712, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 165
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 19, 1920·No. 11412·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the statute rule of civil liability, the procurer of a wrong is a joint wrong-doer. “In all cases he who maliciously procures an injury to be done to another, whether it be an actionable wrong or a breach of contract, is a joint wrong-doer, and may be sued either alone or jointly with the actor.” Civil Code (1910), § 44G9. The word “ procure,” as here used, does not require the lending of assistance in the actual perpetration of the wrong “ done by another; ” but if one, acting only through advice, counsel, persuasion, or command, succeeds in procuring any person to commit an actionable wrong, the procurer becomes liable for the injury, either singly or jointly with the actual perpetrator. The charge of the court was in accordance with the foregoing statement of law, and the verdict for the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed,.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambert v. Cook, 104 S.E. 509, 25 Ga. App. 712, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

104 S.E. 509 (Lambert v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melton v. Helms
62 S.E.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Brigman v. Brenner
56 S.E.2d 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Price v. Cobb
11 S.E.2d 822 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Selman v. Goddard
197 S.E. 250 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Goddard v. Selman
192 S.E. 257 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Wilder v. Gardner
147 S.E. 911 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)