Lambert Gin Co. v. Anderson

140 So. 365, 224 Ala. 317, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 542
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 10, 1932
Docket5 Div. 89.
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 365 (Lambert Gin Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lambert Gin Co. v. Anderson, 140 So. 365, 224 Ala. 317, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 542 (Ala. 1932).

Opinion

BOULDIN, J.

The only question for review is whether the bill is multifarious. It was filed by E. F. Anderson, as receiver of the First National Bank of Tallassee, Ala., against Lambert Gin Company, a corporation, G. W. Lambert, G. D. Lambert, E. A. Cox, C. F. Fincher, and the John F. Clark & Co., a corporation.

The sole and single purpose of the bill is to collect an alleged indebtedness to the bank, arising from numerous transactions, for which each and all the respondents, save the John F. Clark & Co., are alleged to be liable and in aid of such relief to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance from Lambert Gin Company to the John f! Clark & Co., or, in the alternative, to declare it a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. The bill further seeks discovery from the several respondents, other than the John F. Clark & Co. There are also prayers for an injunction, for a receiver, for a reference, etc., all in aid of the one common purpose.

■ The bill is essentially like that held not multifarious in G. W. Lambert et al. v. E. F. Anderson, Receiver, ante, p. 110, 139 So. 287.

This cause is affirmed on the authority of that case and others there cited.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lambert v. Anderson
139 So. 287 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 365, 224 Ala. 317, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-gin-co-v-anderson-ala-1932.