Lambert Engineering & Construction Services, Inc.

CourtArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals
DecidedJanuary 16, 2025
Docket63669
StatusPublished

This text of Lambert Engineering & Construction Services, Inc. (Lambert Engineering & Construction Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lambert Engineering & Construction Services, Inc., (asbca 2025).

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - ) ) Lambert Engineering & Construction ) ASBCA No. 63669 Services, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912PM-17-C-0014 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Justin Lambert President and Owner Laramie, WY

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq. Engineer Chief Trial Attorney Carl E. Pruitt, Jr., Esq. Justin P. McCorcle, Esq. Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Wilmington

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On October 1, 2024, the government filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Board Rule 17. In its motion, the government asserted that appellant failed to take any actions with respect to this appeal since February 2, 2024, when it responded to the government’s discovery requests. Additionally, the government noted that after appellant’s counsel withdrew from the representation in August 2024, appellant’s owner, Mr. Justin Lambert, failed to respond to the government’s subsequent attempts to contact him. The Board also notes that appellant has failed to submit its opening brief as required in the Board’s October 26, 2023, Rule 11 Scheduling Order.

By Order dated October 10, 2024, the Board directed appellant to submit both its response to the government’s motion to dismiss and its Rule 11 opening brief within 30 days from the date of that Order. Appellant was also advised that failure to comply with the Board’s Order could result in the Board dismissing the appeal for failure to prosecute. Appellant has failed to provide a response.

On November 21, 2024, the Board issued an Order to Show Cause, directing appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute within 21 days of the date of the Order. The Board has received no response from appellant. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice under Board Rule 17 for failure to prosecute.

Dated: January 16, 2025

JOHN J. THRASHER Administrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

I concur I concur

OWEN C. WILSON THOMAS P. MCLISH Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63669, Appeal of Lambert Engineering & Construction Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lambert Engineering & Construction Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-engineering-construction-services-inc-asbca-2025.