Lambert Brothers, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company, Limited, Royal Insurance Company, Limited v. Evelyn P. Hines
This text of 190 F.2d 352 (Lambert Brothers, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company, Limited, Royal Insurance Company, Limited v. Evelyn P. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
190 F.2d 352
LAMBERT BROTHERS, Inc., Appellant,
v.
ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, Appellee.
ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, Appellant,
v.
Evelyn P. HINES et al., Appellees.
Nos. 11316, 11315.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
July 25, 1951.
Corn & Bell, Cleveland, Tenn., for appellant Lambert Bros.
Curry & Harris, Chattanooga, Tenn., Maxwell A. Hines, Tifton, Ga., Hardwick Stuart, Cleveland, Tenn., for appellees.
Kefauver, Duggan & Miller, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant Royal Ins. Co.
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that the two appellants have moved to dismiss their appeals: Lambert Brothers, Inc., moving to dismiss its appeal against the Royal Insurance Company, Ltd. and the Royal Insurance Company, Ltd. moving to dismiss its appeal against Evelyn P. Hines, et al.; it is ordered by the Court that these case be, and same hereby are, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 F.2d 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-brothers-inc-v-royal-insurance-company-limited-royal-insurance-ca6-1951.