Lambert Adumekwe v. Bakers Sign and Lighting Maintenance Company
Opinion
Opinion issued August 9, 2012
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01B11B00883BCV
LAMBERT ADUMEKWE, Appellant
V.
BAKER SIGN AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-11019
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Lambert Adumekwe has neither established his entitlement to a
free record on appeal, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 13.003(a)(2) (West
2002) (listing requirements for obtaining free record on appeal); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1
(listing requirements for establishing indigence), 33.1 (listing requirements for
preserving error), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due
to appellant’s fault); Schlapper v. Forest, 272 S.W.3d 676, 678 (Tex. App.—Austin
2008, pet. denied) (appellant fails to meet statutory requirements for receiving a free
record and fails to preserve any error on the issue when appellant fails to request or
obtain the findings required by Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 13.003).
After being ordered to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or be
dismissed for want of prosecution, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record
when required is grounds for dismissal for want of prosecution); 42.3(b) (allowing
involuntary dismissal for want of prosecution).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambert Adumekwe v. Bakers Sign and Lighting Maintenance Company (Lambert Adumekwe v. Bakers Sign and Lighting Maintenance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.