Lamberson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lamberson v. State

323 S.W.3d 417, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1009, 2010 WL 2998599

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 3, 2010·No. No. WD 71806·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Robert Lamberson appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. In [418] his motion, Mr. Lamberson claimed that post-conviction relief (PCR) counsel abandoned him by failing to allege a conflict of interest with trial counsel as a basis to challenge trial counsel’s effectiveness.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Robert Lamberson appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. In [418] his motion, Mr. Lamberson claimed that post-conviction relief (PCR) counsel abandoned him by failing to allege a conflict of interest with trial counsel as a basis to challenge trial counsel’s effectiveness.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Lamberson v. State, 323 S.W.3d 417, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1009, 2010 WL 2998599 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

323 S.W.3d 417 (Lamberson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.