Lambe v. Lenox Hill Hospital

100 A.D.3d 518, 953 N.Y.S.2d 855

This text of 100 A.D.3d 518 (Lambe v. Lenox Hill Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lambe v. Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 A.D.3d 518, 953 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered July 27, 2011, which granted defendant-respondent’s (defendant) motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable cause of action as against defendant. Indeed, read generously, the complaint merely alleges that defendant issued restraining notices on a duly filed default judgment, obtained by predecessor counsel. This conduct does not amount to a tort (Caribbean Constr. Servs. & Assoc. v Zurich Ins. Co., 267 AD2d 81, 83 [1st Dept 1999]). Concur— Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caribbean Construction Services & Associates, Inc. v. Zurich Insurance
267 A.D.2d 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.3d 518, 953 N.Y.S.2d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambe-v-lenox-hill-hospital-nyappdiv-2012.