Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris
1 Del. 22
Opinion
—This evidence is not competent. You must first prove the handwriting of the subscribing witness if he be dead, or insane, or infamous. It is not sufficient to prove the handwriting of the obligor. This is permitted only where the witness does not recollect being present at the time, or did not attest the execution of the instrument.
The plff. was nonsuited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris, 1 Del. 22 (Del. Ct. App. 1832).
1 Del. 22 (Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.