Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris
1 Del. 22
This text of 1 Del. 22 (Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris, 1 Del. 22 (Del. Ct. App. 1832).
Opinion
—This evidence is not competent. You must first prove the handwriting of the subscribing witness if he be dead, or insane, or infamous. It is not sufficient to prove the handwriting of the obligor. This is permitted only where the witness does not recollect being present at the time, or did not attest the execution of the instrument.
The plff. was nonsuited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Del. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambdens-exr-v-norris-delsuperct-1832.