Lambden v. Thompson

155 N.Y.S. 1119

This text of 155 N.Y.S. 1119 (Lambden v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lambden v. Thompson, 155 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order of the Oounty Court

of Westchester Oounty reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application remitted to the county judge of said county for resettlement. The appellant has the right to limit the questions which he seeks to have reviewed on appeal, and is not required unnecessarily to print an entire case. Dupont v. Village of Portchester, 204 N. Y. 351, 356, 97 N. E. 735, 39 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1167, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 1066. Ceballos v. Munson S. S. Line, 112 App. Div. 352, 98 N. Y. Supp. 464.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dupont v. . Village of Port Chester
97 N.E. 735 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Ceballos v. Munson Steamship Line
112 A.D. 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 N.Y.S. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambden-v-thompson-nyappdiv-1915.