Lambden v. Thompson
170 A.D. 953
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lambden v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 A.D. 267 →
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Westchester county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and application remitted to the county judge of said county for resettlement. The appellant has the right to limit the questions which he seeks to have reviewed on appeal, and is not required unnecessarily to print an entire case. (Dupont v. Village of Port Chester, 204 N. Y. 351, 856; Ceballos v. Munson Steamship Line, 112 App. Div. 352.) Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambden v. Thompson, 170 A.D. 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
170 A.D. 953 (Lambden v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dupont v. . Village of Port Chester
97 N.E. 735 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Ceballos v. Munson Steamship Line
112 A.D. 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)