Lamb v. Vergo

133 A.D.2d 514, 519 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49973
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103 by serving a copy of the citation and petition upon respondent Vergo’s attorney. Unless a court order is obtained authorizing a form of substituted service, personal service is required to commence a proceeding in Surrogate’s Court (SCPA 307; Matter of Marko, 56 Misc 2d 138). Petitioner did not seek an order of the court before resorting to substituted service; therefore, personal jurisdiction over respondent Vergo was not obtained in this proceeding. Consequently, the petition must be dismissed. We pass on no other issues. (Appeals from order of Monroe County Surrogate’s Court, Ciaccio, S. — dismiss cause of action.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamb v. Vergo, 133 A.D.2d 514, 519 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

133 A.D.2d 514 (Lamb v. Vergo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Pollina
2020 NY Slip Op 08068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
In re the Estate of Vergo
137 Misc. 2d 619 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1987)