Lamb v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lamb v. State

1923 OK CR 202, 216 P. 1118, 24 Okla. Crim. 144, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 283

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 23, 1923

DocketNo. A-4253.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 202 (Lamb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamb v. State, 1923 OK CR 202, 216 P. 1118, 24 Okla. Crim. 144, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 283 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Bill Lamb, was convicted of assault and battery at the January, 1922, term of the county court of Nowata county, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, February 1, 1922, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 20, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. Plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Bill Lamb, was convicted of assault and battery at the January, 1922, term of the county court of Nowata county, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, February 1, 1922, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 20, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. Plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 202, 216 P. 1118, 24 Okla. Crim. 144, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.